4 ms·
Not refusing service based on sex/age/race/sexual orientation/religion is a good start. It’s also good for business. If a patron of a business comes to do busi
by gabereiser 6y ago
Not refusing service based on sex/age/race/sexual orientation/religion is a good start. It’s also good for business.
If a patron of a business comes to do business, that business should welcome the business and ignore the personal biases and their own bigoted beliefs.
- zepto 6y agoYou didn’t answer my question. I asked who gets to define what counts as bigoted, not what you count as bigoted.
- gabereiser 6y agoBigotry is already defined: Obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction; in particular, prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group. Criteria in this case being the same equal opportunity laws for employment should be applied towards the front of house. Same folks who determine EOE law violations, same folks who determine discrimination violations.
- zepto 6y ago> “Obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction” This is a completely subjective criteria. So now you have an appointed group who gets to force people to do work, under penalty of law. That seems like a bad idea. I am against bigotry. I question the use of force as a way to alleviate it.