3 ms·

One could argue the actual cardinality on offer.

• DangitBobby 6y ago
  One could argue just about anything. I'll reserve my judgement on your argument until after I've heard something other than "I didn't like the outcome so someone did a bad."
  • pjkundert 6y ago
    Focusing a significant fraction of a billion dollars on exactly the jurisdictions required for one side to prevail. Not “bipartisan”.
    • DangitBobby 6y ago
      Really? Do you have any evidence that that happened?
  • smitty1e 6y ago
    By 'cardinality', I question whether the plurality of 'bipartisan' is more than superficial. The validity of the outcome speaks for itself.