3 ms·
In those cases the residents all worked for the company and had no choice of where to live. Is this the plan for the nevada corp towns? If not presumably the c
by graeme 6y ago
In those cases the residents all worked for the company and had no choice of where to live.
Is this the plan for the nevada corp towns? If not presumably the corp towns would have to compete to offer quality living.
- Proven 6y agoThey had a choice, what do you mean they didn't have a choice? They could go work and live elsewhere. This is a great idea, less busybodies and more capitalism!
- MikeUt 6y agoLet this go on long enough, and they'll "compete" the same way ISPs compete to offer you quality service.
- graeme 6y agoHmm. The reason ip’s can do that is that for most people internet speed is incidental to how you live. Whereas these towns would be competing for the thing itself. However there are high switching costs so I could see scenarios where the towns become traps on the decline. Or optimize to get people to move in then take profits on the backend from poor management.
- tyingq 6y ago"undeveloped, uninhabited land within a single county but separate from any city, town or tax increment area" So, yes, you could commute. But it sounds like it might be a long commute. The lower paid staff may not be able to.