I must admit I only skimmed the white paper, and saved it to read in more detail later. Maybe I missed some part that set you off? https://radvac.org/wp-conten

I must admit I only skimmed the white paper, and saved it to read in more detail later. Maybe I missed some part that set you off? https://radvac.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/White-Paper-SARS-CoV-2-vaccine-ver-3-3-1.pdf https://radvac.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/White-Paper-SA... (be aware: there's 3 pages of warnings and disclaimers upfront. They are very clear that this constitutes self-experimentation.) The paper does appear to assume that the reader is indeed an expert or at least a somewhat experienced amateur. If you sign up on their researchers map, they do ask whether you have a science degree and/or lab experience: https://radvac.org/researchers-map/ https://radvac.org/researchers-map/ I must admit I'm stymied by your implication that an antibody test wouldn't constitute evidence that the vaccine had been effective in that instance (n=1). What makes you say that?