4 ms·
The difference is that the US either leverages foreign spies (e.g. trade for its own captured spies) or, like captured sources, they go to prison for breaking e
by bitshiftfaced 6y ago
The difference is that the US either leverages foreign spies (e.g. trade for its own captured spies) or, like captured sources, they go to prison for breaking espionage laws or treason. They don't execute these people like some other countries do.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- MrRiddle 6y agoThis reads like Hollywood. US inteligenc
- bitshiftfaced 6y agoI take it you don't think this sort of stuff actually happens anymore, despite the fact that the headline itself mentions 30+ agents being killed? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_imprisoned_spies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_imprisoned_spies https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jul/09/russian-spies-swap-us https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jul/09/russian-spies-...
- dragonwriter 6y ago> They don't execute these people like some other countries do. Well, the US government doesn't have an incentive to call attention to any extradjudicial killings of foreign spies that it does the way it does when its own agents are extrajudicially killed, and less-democratic states don't need to broadcast foreign counterintelligence killings to build support for desired policies, so the information situation isn't exactly symmetric.
- bitshiftfaced 6y agoIf the US executed 30 Chinese spies, you're saying China would voluntarily suppress that information and allow the world to believe the US didn't do anything improper?