5 ms·
Cant help but think this is GPT-3 generated.
by doof_warrior 6y ago
Cant help but think this is GPT-3 generated.
- AppleTrees2 6y agoI started reading, it seems to pass the smell test for now, will continue reading
- ModernMech 6y agoThe word “till” in the abstract is certainly out of place. I’ve never seen slang like this in a scientific paper.
- goodcanadian 6y agoThe word "till" is not slang. From https://www.dictionary.com/browse/till https://www.dictionary.com/browse/till Till and until are both old in the language and are interchangeable . . . Also First recorded before 900; Middle English; Old English (north) til “to,” from Old Norse til “to,” . . .
- ModernMech 6y agoWell its usage has been beaten out of me for scientific papers, and I’ve never seen it used in the venues I read. Maybe I just need to read more papers.
- Igelau 6y agoTIL
- ripe 6y agoTill is a perfectly valid, formal word. I was just having this argument yesterday: Many people assume that till is a misshapen abbreviation of until... However, till is not a shortening of until. It actually predates the longer word. The above paragraph is from Merriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/should-you-use-until-or-till-or-til https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/should-you-use...
- throwaway316943 6y agoGood night, good night! parting is such sweet sorrow, That I shall say good night till it be morrow.
- cjauvin 6y agoMore context about the paper: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=5253 https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=5253
- ndr 6y agoScott's post is very good. Don't miss the comments, the paper's author is involved there too.
- OscarCunningham 6y agoIf it was, it would have to be from Hanson's own writing. No one else talks like him.