I don't get why I should have a say about how someone wants to spend his money. It seems like the author assumes that a "public-spirited" future is better than

I don't get why I should have a say about how someone wants to spend his money. It seems like the author assumes that a "public-spirited" future is better than "private-spirited" one. > SpaceX wants to shuttle settlers to Mars for $500,000 a ticket, with loans available that could be worked off. Why would this be something inherently "bad" ? > We must envision more public-spirited, collective futures I don't think I need to be an expert about the history of "collective" and "public-spirited" countries, to understand how dangerously authoritarian this can become.