3 ms·

> So much for freedom. If another person isn’t hurting you by building a colony, Who said anything about "non-hurting"? Going back to tech investments, I'm pr

> So much for freedom. If another person isn’t hurting you by building a colony, Who said anything about "non-hurting"? Going back to tech investments, I'm pretty sure that if we were to put the initial investments into companies like Facebook, Twitter or even Google up to vote ("do they deserve the money or not given their future influence on society?") the results would be pretty close, given how much they actually did hurt part of our society. The same goes for these "colonies", which are basically just another tech investment with the potential to influence the life of millions/billions in the future, potentially for the worst.

babesh 6y ago
You still have not shown a single way these colonies hurt. They don’t exist yet. You just read hypotheticals from one side. It is also known as pre-crime. Here are some examples. Look at the Pilgrims. They left because of religious persecution. It doesn’t matter at all if they were or were not rich. Why should you have a say as to why they should not be able to leave?
- babesh 6y ago
  So you are putting up to a vote whether a person or group of people get to leave?
- babesh 6y ago
  If you have an issue with Twitter in current form, go get a law passed. Don’t prosecute them before they have done anything. Don’t go pass laws that violate rights such as freedom of movement.