4 ms·
If they've reached the point where they actually have to use nuclear weapons in a MAD scenario, that political leader in question has failed at doing their job
by WillPostForFood 6y ago
If they've reached the point where they actually have to use nuclear weapons in a MAD scenario, that political leader in question has failed at doing their job utterly, and completely irredeemably. It's a complete and utter betrayal of both their constituents, and the responsibility the world entrusted in them.
Why preface this with an "if" like it is a hypothetical where we don't know what happened? It is history now and we know how it turned out. MAD worked, there was never a nuclear war or major conflict between superpowers.
Political leaders didn't fail and have been redeemed. Their constituents weren't betrayed, and the world moves on.
- cycomanic 6y agoThat we did not have a world war does not imply that MAD works. Moreover the world came incredibly close to total destruction a number of times, and in part it is just look that we are still alive. For example, imagine a different president than Kennedy in power during the Cuban missile crisis.