4 ms·
No, pretty much everyone doesn’t agree that some level of infringement is okay. The nuclear arms strawman is a long way from the myriad of restrictions, regist
by stmfreak 6y ago
No, pretty much everyone doesn’t agree that some level of infringement is okay.
The nuclear arms strawman is a long way from the myriad of restrictions, registrations and required permission for personal weapons. Remember that during the revolution, citizens owned personal cannons and warships with cannons, not to mention bombs. If they didn’t see fit to restrict the most destructive weapons of their day, why should we do so now?
And why would you trust the citizens in your government with nuclear arms, but not the citizens your government serves?
- ceejayoz 6y agoI said “pretty much everyone”, not “absolutely everyone, with zero exceptions”. “Private citizens have a First Amendment right to nuclear arms” is a fringe position.