7 ms·
It still seems pretty rare, even if it's more common. I have had some similar symptoms, and similar interactions with doctors in the past. No, I don't think I
by greesil 6y ago
It still seems pretty rare, even if it's more common. I have had some similar symptoms, and similar interactions with doctors in the past. No, I don't think I have cancer. But, what I want to know is what is the probability of having this condition given the symptoms. In other words, use Bayes' rule. Most doctors seem incapable of thinking this way! If it's a 1% chance that I have a life-threatening condition because there's blood in my stool, then it makes sense to get diagnostic that would test for that. I know these datasets exist, but why can't my doctor make use of this, or me for that matter?
- greedo 6y agoRare doesn't really help when there are almost 8B people on the planet. I was 41 when I was diagnosed with colorectal cancer. I had blood in my stool and my GP misdiagnosed me due to my age. If I hadn't pushed the issue, I wouldn't be here now. If you ever have blood in your stool, get an exam. Preferably by a gastroenterologist.
- Geezus_42 6y agoI had a friend who died of colon cancer in his late teens. We weren't super close so I don't know the details like what variety it was.
- mpfundstein 6y agoHi, mind sharing how the blood in your stool looked like? What was the color etc? Was it there always? Was it occassionally? Was it ON the stool or mixed through it? And when you finally got diagnosed. What stage were you in? Are you healed now? And how long did you put it off? Sry for asking so much.
- greedo 6y agoI noticed bright red blood on my toilet paper periodically. I would ignore it a bit, then worry more when it re-occurred. After a month or so, I went to see my GP (I was 40 at the time). He thought it was just hemorrhoids. A year later my wife convinced me to go back and see what was up. I was referred a week later to my gastroenterologist who diagnosed me with a 5cm tumor. The path report showed that it was T2N0M0. I'm fully healed now, though I have a permanent colostomy.
- mpfundstein 6y agoah congratulations. glad to hear this. few more follow ups if you dont mind :-) so there was no blood in or on the stool itself? and what was the quanitity on the toilet paper? just a small stripe or a lot? and how frequent was it throughout the year? monthly,weekly,daily? thanks :-)
- greedo 6y agoI didn't look at my stool. There was a decent stripe on the toilet paper. I was in denial so I didn't measure it. ;) It was infrequent. My doctor speculated that if I had a firm stool, that would cause the tumor to bleed.
- Daho0n 6y agoYou seem worried with your multiple posts. You really should ask a doctor.
- ekianjo 6y agoNote there can also be blood that is not visible in your stool - (occult blood is the term). It's recommended to check for that on a regular basis and it's fairly easy to confirm their presence.
- Daho0n 6y agoFairly easy to spot not-visible blood? How?
- mpfundstein 6y agoiFOB test
- ks6g10 6y agoFor my experience, noticed rich red blood at first collected in the bowl of the toilet, then started noticing streaks of blood on the stool, consistently there every time. I did put it of for 3 months, and I was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer, that had spread from my colon to the liver through my lymph nodes.
- greesil 6y agoWhat I'm trying to say is that it's rare in the general population. Maybe it's common enough in the population of people that have certain symptoms, like blood in stool, that it really does deserve a strong response and not to be ignored by a doctor.
- greedo 6y agoThe lifetime risk of getting colon cancer is 4% for men. It's the third leading cause of cancer deaths.
- greesil 6y agoWhat about under age 40? Or 45? Or 50?
- greedo 6y agoIn the next 15 years, more than one in 10 colon cancers and nearly one quarter of rectal cancers will be diagnosed in patients ages 20-34, according to the study. It also found that, in this age group, colon and rectal cancers are expected to increase by 90% and 124.2%, respectively, by 2030. For those ages 35-49, the predicted increase will be 27.7% for colon cancer and 46% for rectal cancer. Routine screening currently is not recommended for those under 50. https://www.mdanderson.org/publications/conquest/colorectal-cancer-doesnt-care-how-old-you-are.h37-1589835.html https://www.mdanderson.org/publications/conquest/colorectal-... Also, if you have a family history of colorectal cancer, you should definitely get examined earlier.
- splittingTimes 6y agoDo we know the cause of this? More consumption of red meats?
- greedo 6y agoI've seen a study that points in that direction, but I don't think that's conclusive.
- Lichtverschwend 6y agoBlood may not be present in sufficient quantity to be detected visually or not at all so keep looking out for other irregularities (being I'll is irregular). Examples: strange badly smelling diarrhoea (not one you might have after a having eaten something that was a little off) or burning sensation (which might get dismissed as a diverticulitis).
- agumonkey 6y agoA few years ago there was a somehow public trend saying there was an epidemic of over diagnosis. People would have more medical exams like colonoscopy and would get treatment over the simplest signs and the effects were not good. I don't know how true it is, but it may explain why docs in general refuse to go too early on exams.
- greedo 6y agoI've heard of this issue with mammograms, but not with colorectal cancer. Complications from a colonoscopy are very rare, and removing polyps before they become malignant is a pretty safe choice as well.
- agumonkey 6y agoMaybe I was wrong but it was clearly related to the lower torso.. maybe prostate cancer overdiagnosis ?..