2 ms·
Confirms my intuition, but the magnitude of the effect seems like it’s probably overstated. 5.8% vs 31.5% would suggest a lot more infection occurs via the eye
by tiahura 6y ago
Confirms my intuition, but the magnitude of the effect seems like it’s probably overstated. 5.8% vs 31.5% would suggest a lot more infection occurs via the eyes than seems plausible.
- foolmeonce 6y agoI wonder about the timing and behavior aspects. If there was near total compliance with masks and if they are highly effective then it would make sense that remaining infections were via the eye. But I'm surprised wearing a mask with glasses wouldn't lead to more incompliance or accidental exposure due to fogging..