No. There is difference. Science works by making observations, making hypothesis and then testing those. The result is some kind of knowledge which is useful fo

No. There is difference. Science works by making observations, making hypothesis and then testing those. The result is some kind of knowledge which is useful for making predictions. Reasoning in this world is based on that. We only make predictions when something is tested, established or pure fact. What I mean by pseudo-science type reasoning is; not based on any fact, nor any position which has been tested (scientifically), nor any established knowledge. Instead it is often based on anecdotes or the reason is motivated or heavily biased. Frankly, I don’t care too much about bad reasoning. But when there is risk that it might be understood as recommendations, and it might be unsafe for someone reading it, then I think it’s dangerous.