4 ms·
It's close not but quite. That problem is describing terms where the issue is a substring of the term itself. Here, the issue is due to the gross sexual fetish
by thereare5lights 6y ago
It's close not but quite. That problem is describing terms where the issue is a substring of the term itself.
Here, the issue is due to the gross sexual fetishization of Asians in western culture. That is, it's context based, not term based.
- astura 6y agoNo, it is the Scunthorpe problem. There's no rule the "banned" term has to be a substring, just the filter blocks it because in a different context it would violate the content policy. >The Scunthorpe problem is the unintentional blocking of websites, e-mails, forum posts or search results by a spam filter or search engine because their text contains a string (or substring) of letters that appear to have an obscene or otherwise unacceptable meaning. They go on to give examples such as a profanity filter blocking the word "bone" at a paleontology conference and a user banned for saying "great tits" when referring to the bird.
- thereare5lights 6y agoNo, it isn't. From the article > The Scunthorpe problem is the unintentional blocking of websites, e-mails, forum posts or search results by a spam filter or search engine because their text contains a string (or substring) of letters that appear to have an obscene or otherwise unacceptable meaning. Names, abbreviations, and technical terms are most often cited as being affected by the issue. Specifically > because their text contains a string (or substring) of letters that appear to have an obscene or otherwise unacceptable meaning.
- worker767424 6y ago> gross sexual fetishization of Asians in western culture No need to pass so much judgement.
- thereare5lights 6y agoWhat?
- justnotworthit 6y agoNo need to pass so much judgement.