>The (rather massive) flaw in your reasoning is the idea that Google and Apple are the solution to the problem. What makes you say that? I see nothing in thei

>The (rather massive) flaw in your reasoning is the idea that Google and Apple are the solution to the problem. What makes you say that? I see nothing in their comment which implies Google and Apple could or should solve the problems of oppressive countries. If a criminal who wants to commit murder asks me to sell them a gun and I decline, it would be absurd to think that implied I thought I could solve the problem of murder. Rather, I would simply be refusing to be a conscious, direct enabler of murder. It would be nakedly malicious for me to reason "well, if I don't sell them this gun, someone else will, so I might as well make some money."