4 ms·
Mmm, you do realize they’re roughly the same size, though, right? Calling one a “lumbering behemoth” and the other two door sports car (technically true, but yo
by boardwaalk 6y ago
Mmm, you do realize they’re roughly the same size, though, right? Calling one a “lumbering behemoth” and the other two door sports car (technically true, but you’re saying this for effect, I suspect) is a bit much.
- mywittyname 6y agoThe Mach E is as long and wide as the current Mustang, but the wheelbase of the Mach E is 10" longer (which is a lot), 9" taller (which is a lot), and between 400-1000 lbs heavier (which is a whole lot). For perspective, dropping the wheelbase, height, and weight of current Mustang by that much puts you in a car roughly the size of a BRZ, but as tall as a first generation Miata.
- boardwaalk 6y agoThat all seems correct. In my mind, it still roughly the same form factor; e.g. it’d fit in all the same parking garages and spaces. That’s why I’m calling out the “lumbering behemoth” thing. This isn’t an Expedition or something. Since you’re making references to the agility of the thing (wheelbase and weight), I’d be curious how the Mach E does in the real world, though. (Do people even buy Mustangs with this in mind?)