I don't think this is ironic. It seems to me the intention is to encourage tech companies to be more selective in what they allow. I do not agree with your cla

I don't think this is ironic. It seems to me the intention is to encourage tech companies to be more selective in what they allow. I do not agree with your claim that "they would be both legally and morally justified in using draconian measures". Here's why: 1. Morality is different from legality, especially in this context 2. Draconian means "excessively harsh and severe". I don't think the bill if passed would provide protections for companies that are "excessively harsh or severe". These companies still operate in a broader context that includes market forces, public perception, and internal leadership in addition to regulation.