The first part of the bill seems reasonable... This part >Under the SAFE TECH Act, the word "information" would be swapped out for the word "speech," narrowin

The first part of the bill seems reasonable... This part >Under the SAFE TECH Act, the word "information" would be swapped out for the word "speech," narrowing the law and potentially erasing liability protections for a range of other illicit information-sharing that happens on online platforms. I worry about. Who gets to decide what's classed as speech or not? What's the definition of 'speech'? Will it end up being left to a judge to determine on a case by case basis?