3 ms·
> Twice it is stated that hypersonic missiles have "few" advantages over cruise or ballistic technologies. But few isn't zero and the difference could be crucia
by josefresco 6y ago
> Twice it is stated that hypersonic missiles have "few" advantages over cruise or ballistic technologies. But few isn't zero and the difference could be crucial.
But isn't that the author's point? That these weapons are evolutionary, not revolutionary?
- topspin 6y agoWhether hypersonic weapons are evolutionary or revolutionary isn't presently knowable or based on any meaningful measurement. Cleverly written guesswork.
- SiempreViernes 6y agoThat argument works perfectly well both ways you know, meaning arguments in favour of their utility are equally speculative until we've had us a proper war.
- topspin 6y agoBad arguments aren't better than no arguments.