3 ms·
I don't think it's OCR. The imperfections in each letter are identical in every single instance. It's very clear if you zoom in
by injb 6y ago
I don't think it's OCR. The imperfections in each letter are identical in every single instance. It's very clear if you zoom in
- dogma1138 6y agoIt is OCR inspect the pdf yourself the defects are also not identical at all... https://imgur.com/a/QnfBRas https://imgur.com/a/QnfBRas It’s a relatively clean scan and good quality print. It can ofc be fake but you are going down some rabbit hole for the wrong reasons.
- injb 6y agoI was talking about the document that's the subject of the post.
- dogma1138 6y agoThat’s a translation of the Russian document, the KGB aren’t going to write their documents in English. It’s literally says translated by.... This is the translator https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_A._Fitzpatrick https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_A._Fitzpatrick She used to run Radio Free Europe.
- injb 6y agoI'm not sure what your point is. We all know it's a translation. I merely pointed out that it has been artificially made to look like it was scanned or photocopied, when in fact that is a special font that fakes the appearance of imperfections. You contradicted that, so I just responded to prove it.
- dogma1138 6y agoThat doesn’t makes it fake... it’s just a typewriter font.