Pretty standard low-tech-accuracy clickbaity article. I didn't realize Reuters did those, but I haven't paid attention in a while. So what exactly did they sei

Pretty standard low-tech-accuracy clickbaity article. I didn't realize Reuters did those, but I haven't paid attention in a while. So what exactly did they seize? If it wasn't a brainwallet, or was a physical device that they believe had no backups, the story would make more sense. Would have been pretty easy to include that info. Also, if they have ensured the guy can't access it, like the article says, then this goes beyond seizure. They just want the money for themselves.