I kind of don't get it. Is it supposed to be a critique, or a praise? I find the tone to be strange. Local governments in most US states already have authori

I kind of don't get it. Is it supposed to be a critique, or a praise? I find the tone to be strange. Local governments in most US states already have authority comparable to much bigger territorial subjects in other countries, and this is nothing new. So, it is completely in the spirit of the law if their Nevadan laws give their local government authority to, say, make Samsung a mayor of a city. If Nevadans don't like that, they can take away that authority from local governments.