> 4x10 shifts are not a new concept. This sort of argument sounds like a red herring. It's irrelevant if a company pioneers exploitative working conditions. W

> 4x10 shifts are not a new concept. This sort of argument sounds like a red herring. It's irrelevant if a company pioneers exploitative working conditions. What's relevant is that the company is imposing exploitative working conditions. Isn't the whole point of society to ensure everyone has the right to a decent living? Why are we arguing about the virtues of forcing a Dickensian work cycle?