3 ms·
> having an abundant supply of food is unquestionably good It's not unquestionably good. It allows a small number of people to have really great lives but blow
by DC1350 6y ago
> having an abundant supply of food is unquestionably good
It's not unquestionably good. It allows a small number of people to have really great lives but blows up the population of people with terrible lives. Most people in all of human history had short and miserable lives where they slaved away all day to make bread and die from war or disease. They would have been better off as hunter gatherers. Is that worth it? I don't really know
- kmonsen 6y agoI think that is a questionable statement. Without agriculture there is no modern medicine which provides a lot of life quality, also there is very little starvation in the world today.
- LargoLasskhyfv 6y agoThe great hunters gathered it would be more convenient to have the spoils of war served to them by slaves. Ecofacism will hold the masses managable, while still allowing for real hunting in the forbidden natural reserves and great adventures in space! Spaceward Ho!