> To be fair those are powered by two different mechanisms You can call it like that, but in the end it is the same language feature: describing things in a sc

> To be fair those are powered by two different mechanisms You can call it like that, but in the end it is the same language feature: describing things in a scope as implicit and having the compiler resolve them by certain rules. What happened in Scala 3 is just that they were named different to make clear when things get defined and when they get used - one without the other is useless though, hence to me it is the same concept or language feature.