4 ms·
Thanks, Dr. Paul. No, but really, I agree with you. However, this might still be a step in that direction, as less tax money for the government to spend means
by technoguyrob 18y ago
Thanks, Dr. Paul.
No, but really, I agree with you. However, this might still be a step in that direction, as less tax money for the government to spend means less spending.
- fallentimes 18y agoI know you were half kidding, but I'm _not_ saying eliminate 90% of the government or put an end to all government programs or anything like that. Cutting spending by 20% would work wonders. And while I admire the awareness Ron Paul has raised about government waste, he's crazy and has yet to accept evolution.