> Section 230 doesn't give blanket immunity to publishing illegal content: it only protects against civil violations, not criminal. Of course you are correct,

> Section 230 doesn't give blanket immunity to publishing illegal content: it only protects against civil violations, not criminal. Of course you are correct, but that doesn't make me factually wrong. You are talking about publishing illegal content. But (c)(1) "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." And I missed DMCA takedowns.