They don't view preferential resume screening to be bias. Bias is only at the interview stage, the rest is the "pipeline", all they do is put more women in the

They don't view preferential resume screening to be bias. Bias is only at the interview stage, the rest is the "pipeline", all they do is put more women in the "pipeline" by accepting resumes from women that wouldn't be accepted if they were men. They then have to pass the same interview process, so the entire process is "fair". I'm not sure if that would hold in court though. And I bet many would argue that such treatment isn't really fair, that interview screening isn't a part of the recruitment pipeline and instead is a part of the assessment and therefore should be unbiased.