3 ms·
What are you talking about? Are you in the right thread? None of this makes sense in regards to my parent comments. Yikes. And I'm not engaging in your "Mus
by cozuya 6y ago
What are you talking about? Are you in the right thread? None of this makes sense in regards to my parent comments. Yikes. And I'm not engaging in your "Muslims are bad" whataboutism deflection. What extreme actions do you see me advocating for here? What stereotypes am I propagating?
Weird stuff.
- subjectsigma 6y agoThis is not hard to follow, try and keep up. Qanon supporters represent a small fraction of Republicans. Muslim extremists represent a small fraction of Muslims. Your comment talks about the "acceptable percentage" of Republicans who believe in Qanon. Travel bans for Muslims were justified based on the rise in Islamic terrorism - e.g. "An unacceptable percentage of Muslims are engaged in terrorism, we must ban ALL of them." In both cases the majority is misrepresented by the minority. In both cases criticism against the minority is misapplied to the majority. In the first case you argue that this is justified, whereas I argue in both cases it is not. It is wrong because Muslims and Muslim Terrorists are two different groups. It is wrong because Republicans and Qanon Crazies are two different groups. > What stereotypes am I propagating? Oh, so you are arguing in bad faith. Nevermind.
- cozuya 6y ago> Guy/gal makes an embarrassingly boring, potentially racist deflection of the discussion to a Muslim whataboutism nonsense > I tell him I'm not interested in engaging in a Muslim whataboutism deflection next post: > Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim Muslim What a waste of your time and effort.
- subjectsigma 6y agocozuya, you said you're not interested in engaging but replied within six minutes! My email is in my profile if you want to talk more.