3 ms·
It's simple, very simple. XMPP is by far more fluid, and "productive" when it comes adding new protocol features, or at least if you compare it with Signal. M
by baybal2 6y ago
It's simple, very simple.
XMPP is by far more fluid, and "productive" when it comes adding new protocol features, or at least if you compare it with Signal.
Marlinspike is making up the problem.
A messaging client is as agile as its developers are, and in case of Signal, not that much.
Evolving a protocol, and developing new features is done by doing programming, and not by some philosophical discourses, and pooing over the competition on tech events.