Parler isn't disputing that abusive content was posted. Their claim is for breach of contract, antitrust, and torturous interference. The following is an excer

Parler isn't disputing that abusive content was posted. Their claim is for breach of contract, antitrust, and torturous interference. The following is an excerpt from https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29095511/34/parler-llc-v-amazon-web-services-inc/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29095511/34/parler-llc-... the order denying the injunction. "AWS has submitted to the Court multiple representative examples, reflecting content posted on Parler during this period, that AWS claims violated the terms of the AUP and the parties’ Agreement. ... Parler has not denied that these posts are abusive or that they violate the Acceptable Use Policy. "