43 ms·
Does this use TCP over TCP (painful in the face of packet loss[1]) or can you do something like using QUIC for the forward proxy to try to avoid breaking the tu
by theptip 6y ago
Does this use TCP over TCP (painful in the face of packet loss[1]) or can you do something like using QUIC for the forward proxy to try to avoid breaking the tunneled TLS connection's retry timers?
[1]: http://sites.inka.de/sites/bigred/devel/tcp-tcp.html http://sites.inka.de/sites/bigred/devel/tcp-tcp.html
- mholt 6y agoHttp3 support is being talked about in an issue (am mobile so no link for you right now) but the first priority -- pending dev resources -- is to merge the v2 PR and vet for bugs.
- lxgr 6y agoIt looks like a normal HTTP proxy supporting CONNECT (i.e. TLS over TLS), which wouldn't suffer from the problem you mention. Note that TLS over TLS is _not_ the same thing as TCP over TCP. TCP over TCP is usually only a problem for VPNs or something similar (i.e. anything that sends raw IP packets over TCP).
- theptip 6y agoAh, that's the piece I was missing. Thanks.