Ok, then we're in the same boat because I also don't understand what you mean. You're asserting that "killing 3rd party cookies is not anti-competitive". You p

Ok, then we're in the same boat because I also don't understand what you mean. You're asserting that "killing 3rd party cookies is not anti-competitive". You presented no proof about this, it is just an opinion. Your entire point about what the valid options are is based on this assertion. On the other hand, several US states and a US house committee apparently think otherwise, and the UK regulators think it at least merits investigation. And yes, when evaluating whether there is regulatory risk from "killing 3rd party cookies", obviously the group from the previous paragraph is going to matter more than yours. I am not "accusing you of the thing you're against". I'm not even sure what "you're against" or what the accusation is supposed to be.