3 ms·
This article is confusing. I was excited to see someone using research to bubble up a story. Then the writer puts a doctor on the hot seat with no conclusion in
by meee 6y ago
This article is confusing. I was excited to see someone using research to bubble up a story. Then the writer puts a doctor on the hot seat with no conclusion in the article for him to refute. Is this a teaser for an article to come? I think a good article would tell us how the insurance providers felt about the charges. Do they disagree with the doctor's assesment? Does this represent fraud? Is he taking advantage of ill defined rules?
- tylerchilds 6y agoI enabled JavaScript because I thought the rest of the article needed to load, but it just ends abruptly.
- mandevil 6y agoThis is a special behind-the-scenes article describing how the journalist did her work. If you read the article with JS turned on, you would see a link to the original article this is the backstory for: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/upshot/covid-testing-doctor-fees.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/upshot/covid-testing-doct... Published back in November.
- tylerchilds 6y agothis makes so much more sense now, thanks!
- istjohn 6y ago> Times Insider explains who we are and what we do, and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. The actual article is: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/upshot/covid-testing-doctor-fees.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/upshot/covid-testing-doct...
- trulyme 6y agoThank you! The link should be changed, this article actually makes sense.