3 ms·
These are ridiculously broad strokes. It's not at all obvious to me that the notions you're derisively referencing are 'opposite of reality'. When you respond
by LMYahooTFY 6y ago
These are ridiculously broad strokes. It's not at all obvious to me that the notions you're derisively referencing are 'opposite of reality'.
When you respond with pure rhetoric to an op-ed it just sounds like an echo chamber.
- seltzered_ 6y agoIt seems relatively easy to find references to the what the parent author is referring to: elon: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1353564655088619520 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1353564655088619520 chamath: https://twitter.com/chamath/status/1354947541863780365 https://twitter.com/chamath/status/1354947541863780365
- LMYahooTFY 6y agoI'm not sure what you mean. How does that substantiate the parent's derisiveness...? How are Chamath/Musk so obviously wrong?
- seltzered_ 6y agoI'll admit the parent was caricaturizing these two figures. As far as whether two well-known people might be 'wrong', I say it's worth starting to find the journalists and academics who try really hard to not have a bias and tried to understand things over the years. Hold space for the perspective of the reasoned skeptics/short-sellers but also understand their own character flaws.
- Apocryphon 6y agoThe caricatures are likely correct at some level, since the mark of a good businessman, especially in the modern day, is ability to build hype...