2 ms·
> 1. If the presence of something is not a reliable feature of the environment, dependence on that something will be ruthlessly weeded out. Something is only w
by jostmey 6y ago
> 1. If the presence of something is not a reliable feature of the environment, dependence on that something will be ruthlessly weeded out.
Something is only weeded out if it is sufficiently disadvantageous. There are lots of examples in biology where mutations are neutral and allowed to accumulate. There is also a lot of junk DNA, and even though we've found that some junk DNA was misclassified, there still is a lot of junk DNA in each genome
- thaumasiotes 6y agoDependence on something that isn't there is disadvantageous by the definition of "dependence". I don't see the point you're trying to make.