2 ms·
> The first version of the iPhone (3G) is very slow and clunky. Is compared to current models. Back in 2007 it was more than OK. > How about the issues with
by rimantas 15y ago
> The first version of the iPhone (3G) is very slow and clunky.
Is compared to current models. Back in 2007 it was more than OK.
> How about the issues with the antenna on the 4
That was media noises, not real issues. The issue with proximity sensor was more serious than antenna-gate.
> how bad the service was (has been?) in NYC/SF
That's AT&T, not iPhone.
> This is actually what I find remarkable about Apple's iPhone success.
It was an amazing product. Look at it in context, don't compare with current situation.
- drats 15y agoI can confirm the iPhone 3G jumped the gun by a long way. I got one of the early versions that had next to no reception. In the USA some people went into stores and got replacements. Outside the USA I got fobbed off on the support line and got to pay for an expensive data plan I couldn't use for two years. That's over 1000 euros for what amounted to an ipod touch: and I don't use iTunes. As you can imagine I researched this quite a lot and I'm quite aware of Apple's other iPhone problems, and the problems they've had with various laptop models. They are well behind a number of phone and PC manufacturers in terms of hardware quality.