> Nothing there seemed to be much worse than I've seen on Twitter (actually, Twitter stuff was far worse). https://i.redd.it/om90nwadqca61.png https://i.redd.i

> Nothing there seemed to be much worse than I've seen on Twitter (actually, Twitter stuff was far worse). https://i.redd.it/om90nwadqca61.png https://i.redd.it/om90nwadqca61.png is a Parler post with a racial slur and 25k upvotes. Twitter has its issues but an equivalent comment isn't going to survive two days. The court documents from their case against Amazon are available at https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29095511/parler-llc-v-amazon-web-services-inc/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29095511/parler-llc-v-a.... Amazon's declarations contain other examples of content that wouldn't survive on Twitter. > Regardless, this is besides the point: all a competitor has to do is post some garbage and point to it, and boom, you're dead. That's not ok. According to https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29095511/13/parler-llc-v-amazon-web-services-inc/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/29095511/13/parler-llc-... it took several months of moderation problems before AWS dropped Parler as a client. If Parler had done more active moderation and tried harder to keep Amazon happy they'd still be hosted on AWS.