5 ms·
It should really just have been 3.0 for 5gbit/s, 3.1 for 10gbit/s and 3.2 for 20gbit/s - nothing hard to understand, same deal as usb 1 and 2 beforehand
by iMerNibor 6y ago
It should really just have been 3.0 for 5gbit/s, 3.1 for 10gbit/s and 3.2 for 20gbit/s - nothing hard to understand, same deal as usb 1 and 2 beforehand
- ihsw 6y agoThe idea is to be intentionally confusing so that consumers buy crappy cables instead of seeing "USB 3.0? Old news, don't buy."
- apple4ever 6y agoThat's how I still refer to them in my head. I'm still baffled why they didn't do that.