Removing third party cookies benefits the end users as a side effect. But you could argue that advertisers are people too, and that Google are using their mono

Removing third party cookies benefits the end users as a side effect. But you could argue that advertisers are people too, and that Google are using their monopoly to reduce competition and drive up prices for a segment of the population. Is there a rule that says if antitrust benefits one segment of people and hurts another the it's OK?