In the same way, the original comment maybe didn't mean literally nobody was buying, but significantly fewer than were selling. This seems vaguely plausible if

In the same way, the original comment maybe didn't mean literally nobody was buying, but significantly fewer than were selling. This seems vaguely plausible if you believe the narrative about short sellers; a single or small number of people could have been covering their short at the top. In theory. I'm not saying I firmly believe it.