2 ms·
I believe they already did lawyerising, as written above. They grabbed onto the wording of PII as "personally identifiable information" that information is ide
by baybal2 6y ago
I believe they already did lawyerising, as written above.
They grabbed onto the wording of PII as "personally identifiable information" that information is identifiable, but not personally identifiable, so it is ok to use for ads.
- ngold 6y agoSo we knows it's you, but you are a integer.
- teddyh 6y ago“I am not a number! I am a free man!” — The Prisoner
- WesolyKubeczek 6y agoReminds me of this: "So here I was now, two years just to the day of being kicked and clanged into Staja 84F, dressed in the height of prison fashion, which was a one-piece suit of a very filthy like cal colour, and the number sewn on the groody part just above the old tick-tocker and on the back as well, so that going and coming I was 6655321 and not your little droog Alex not no longer."
- ricardo81 6y agoNothing like a little bit indirection to make it not true. It's blatantly obvious all the ways G can build a profile of someone by fingerprinting. Unfortunately it's not exactly an elevator pitch to make it a common knowledge thing.
- chopin 6y agoI don't think this would stand up to scrutiny if the EU was willing to really enforce the GDPR (unfortunately they are not).