Just basic logical fallacy that "some people are bribed this way, ergo, she was bribed this way". This is a matter of public record, and she was made $7M in sp

Just basic logical fallacy that "some people are bribed this way, ergo, she was bribed this way". This is a matter of public record, and she was made $7M in speaking fees in the past two years. It is a small percentage of her income, and not worth more a small fraction the future value of her reputation. The idea Yellen - one of just three living Fed chairs and one of the most influential figures in economics - would do political favors for $300k is honestly ridiculous. I have asked it elsewhere, but if you want to prevent this, you are making it illegal or disqualifying. I would personally like to know where the line would be drawn for public service. It seems like having an employment relationship would be far more influencing than a speaking engagement. It is important to emphasize this speech is disclosed and public knowledge.