3 ms·
Good point. I don’t think this is the likely correlation, but I think that whatever is causing more murders is also causing fewer stops. The author suggests it
by prepend 6y ago
Good point. I don’t think this is the likely correlation, but I think that whatever is causing more murders is also causing fewer stops.
The author suggests it’s fewer police out and about policing. It might be that.
This is a really card situation to prove causation since it’s retrospective observational. But maybe more researchers can try to isolate variables and find controls, etc.
For me, it’s trying to find a reasonable story so I can stop wondering. I imagine that police waking and driving around arresting people doesn’t stop murders, but fewer police being around doing stuff might result in more violence.
- enoch_r 6y agoYou may be interested in this study: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=586405 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=586405 The authors used changes in the terror alert level (which caused increases in police presence) as a natural experiment, and found that crime dropped significantly in the area when the terror level increased. I think the explanation here is probably quite simple: an increase in the number of police officers in an area means that calls are responded to more quickly and for any given crime the criminal has a higher chance of being arrested. As we'd expect, a high likelihood of negative consequences deters crime.