> people insisted that it was foolish to require bundling of routine insurance with catastrophic insurance, people advocate for the severability of hardware and

> people insisted that it was foolish to require bundling of routine insurance with catastrophic insurance, people advocate for the severability of hardware and operating systems, people oppose forced bundling of insurance and all kinds of other goods. None of that is collective bargaining. > This doesn’t offer a counterpoint to my point. One comment earlier: "Because collective bargaining results in a net decrease in value"