3 ms·
> because the definition of crime changed around you Well, if that's the way you're looking at it, there's not much point passing a law banning the use of faci
by commandlinefan 6y ago
> because the definition of crime changed around you
Well, if that's the way you're looking at it, there's not much point passing a law banning the use of facial recognition technology, since that law could be changed after the fact too.
- Bakary 6y agoIt's more about discouraging the implementation of infrastructure as much as possible. To some extent, I agree with you: the change is almost inevitable at this point. But any delay represents fewer lives through the grinder and thus presents a clear reason to act.