3 ms·
> Wikipedia has no definition of what makes a source “reliable”. Yes it does. Here's the definition of "reliable source": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip
by toomim 6y ago
> Wikipedia has no definition of what makes a source “reliable”.
Yes it does. Here's the definition of "reliable source":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
- Blikkentrekker 6y agoNone of this defines what source is reliable and what source not. What it does do is list some properties that do not immediately disqualify a source from being reliable, and what makes a source automatically unreliable, but that's it. All other definitions are circular, in the vein of Academic research is reliable, if it be published in a reliable, reputable journal..