4 ms·
Ok fine, but in your original post you don't provide any dates, and you assert that: > It had a name, and that name was "Cadabra". Now you're saying something
by teh_klev 6y ago
Ok fine, but in your original post you don't provide any dates, and you assert that:
> It had a name, and that name was "Cadabra".
Now you're saying something different. So it's one thing or another. Maybe just clarify the "when" of these things as you remember them. Not having a go at you.
- GavinMcG 6y agoThis seems like nitpicking. Especially because "Amazon" being chosen in '94 doesn't mean Cadabra wasn't the name it was chosen to replace. How is Paul "saying something different"?
- ChrisIsTaken 6y agoRegistration for Cadabra was filed in July 1994. I suspect this was chosen because Bezos' attorney had discovered that his first preference "Abracadabra" was taken. Amazon was a much better choice.