> How would a conviction take place without a jury? I believe the parent's point was that it could take place with a jury from anywhere else, thereby violating

> How would a conviction take place without a jury? I believe the parent's point was that it could take place with a jury from anywhere else, thereby violating the letter of the 6th amendment, but without this having an effect: The convicted person would have to appeal the conviction, but no higher court would decide to hear the appeal. (I'm not a lawyer either, I'm just writing down my understanding of what the parent said.)