4 ms·
Retiring at 57 is pretty risky. Hopefully his savings hold out. He's looking at 30 more years of life. Personally I would be too cautious to leave this early.
by keanebean86 6y ago
Retiring at 57 is pretty risky. Hopefully his savings hold out. He's looking at 30 more years of life. Personally I would be too cautious to leave this early.
Edit: risking -> risky; fixed life sentence
- faangeng 6y agoYeah maybe he should've worked a few more years to shore up his net worth a bit, a 50% drop in the market might force him back to work
- genericone 6y agoHopefully he has enough saved up in his 401k, his situation may be better on traditional 401k vs roth.
- mywittyname 6y agoWhat a world we live in where a guy can work for 30+ years in Big Tech and still not be able to comfortably retire.
- elindbe3 6y agoYeah, he's just one health crisis from complete bankruptcy. What if he goes to the hospital complaining of a headache and they charge him $182 billion for an aspirin?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- halfmatthalfcat 6y agoWhether this is satire or serious, I love it.
- anewaccount2021 6y agoYup health insurance is particularly expensive for older Americans!
- bigiain 6y agoSuper risky. Assuming he lives past 100, and gets zero interest/return on his ~200 billion net worth, he’ll need to somehow keep his spending below about a thousand dollars a minute to survive. Sounds like real poverty to me...